Monday, December 30, 2013

New York Times Benghazi Propaganda

Even though there is significant evidence to the contrary, the New York Times, a well known Socialist newspaper, recently published an article restating the original Obamanista position that the attack on our Consulate and murder of 4 Americans in Benghazi was the result of a spontaneous demonstration related to a video posted on the Internet disparaging Islam.  Of course, this is B--L S--T; but if there was any doubt, this story confirms that Hillary Clinton will be running for President in 2016. 

The Clinton Machine is undoubtedly behind this article because the Benghazi Scandal happened under both Obama and Hillary Clinton's watch, since she was Secretary of State at the time.  The Clinton's are already anticipating the attack ads that will show Hillary testifying before Congress, when she screamed, "What Difference Does It Make" why, or how these Americans were killed.  Well, I would say to the families of these dead Americans and the American people, it makes a huge difference. 

The Benghazi attack happened on 9/11 and both testimony before Congress and many documents demonstrate that it was a coordinated and planned attack by an affiliate of Al Queda.  Ironically, even after spending billions of dollars, the huge NSA spying apparatus did nothing to stop this attack.  Even Socialists in Congress now accept these facts.  Further, the State Department had been warned of the potential for violence in Benghazi and ignored the warnings requesting more security.  Clearly, Hillary Clinton and those below here dropped the ball.  However, the New York Times like Pravda in the old Communist Soviet Union is the mouth piece of the Socialist Party of America so we will never hear the true story from them. 

The attack happened over a 9 hour period of time.  The White House will not confirm Obama's whereabouts during this crisis probably because Obama was getting ready to fly to Nevada and then on to California for campaign stops the next morning.   Obama may very well have been in the air, rather than in the White House Situation Room dealing with this attack.   Where ever Obama was, the White House was watching this attack in real time as it was happening and did nothing to send help.  It is shameful.  In any case, the New York Times story on Benghazi is just another white wash propaganda piece designed to shield Hillary Clinton from the future criticism that is bound to come when she runs for President. 

Sorry Hilly, you can't hide from this debacle.  When the ad is run in 2016 showing the phone ringing at 3 o'clock in the morning, the same ad that Hillary Clinton ran against an inexperienced Barack Obama in 2008, this time, it will ask is Hillary ready to be President given her failure on Benghazi.   Four Americans are dead because Hillary Clinton ignored their pleas for more security.  That alone should disqualify Hillary Clinton from even running for President; but we won't hear it from the reporters in lame stream left wing media at the New York Times. 

No comments:

Post a Comment