Obama - The New and Improved Version

It is expected that President Obama will come out swinging on January 27 for his first State of the Union Address. Instead of learning the lessons of the Massachusetts massacre, the Obamanistas actually took away a completely different lesson than is obvious to the rest of us. The conservative Republican Scott Brown ran against everything Obama; HealthScare, Higher Taxes, Failure to properly deal with Terrorists; yet somehow the Obamanistas claimed that Brown's victory reflected 8 years of anger at George W Bush. One would think if that was the case that voters would have elected Martha Coakley, the Democrat Socialist that supported Obama's Socialist Schemes. However, in Obama's narcissistic world, the election of Scott Brown signaled that Obama is not moving fast enough to implement the President's Socialist Schemes. Go figure.

Of course, other Democrat Socialists got it right and are now in a panic mode fearing a repeat of 1994, when the Republicans gained control of both houses of Congress during the Clinton Presidency for the first time in 40 years. Obama has assured those in panic not to worry because the President claims that 2010 will be different than 1994 because they have HIM, the anointed one, on their side this time around. Democrat Socialists, how is that working for you? Obama is batting 0 for 3 in New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts so it would be easy to conclude that having HIM is not worth very much. Clearly, President Obama suffers from delusions of grandeur in spite of the current election losses.

During the State of the Union Address rather than saying he got the message from
Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia, President Obama apparently is going to proceed full speed ahead with all his crazy Socialist Schemes including some version of HealthScare, tax increases during a recession, which is insane, CAP & TAX, more deficit spending and otherwise big government proposals. Obama has said that he would rather be a "successful" one term President than a mediocre two term President. Well great, we can arrange that in 2012 as we vote to boot Obama out of office. However, we need to give Obama a history lesson. Presidents that are not reelected lose because they have failed not because they have succeeded. Well dah! The problem is that if Obama continues along the current path, he will have a failed Presidency, just like Jimmy Carter. But even more important, because Obama does not understand the threat of Terrorism to our nation, he is endangering our country and our people. Obama would rather be a citizen of the world than the President of the United States even though his actions are a clear and present danger to our country.

During the State of the Union Address, Obama will claim to be the champion of the middle class even though his Socialist Schemes are job killer bills that will raise their taxes and cost of living. Obama talks about his enemies list; namely Big and Small Companies, Banks, Insurance Companies, Oil and other energy companies, Pharmaceutical Companies, Companies that hold conferences in Las Vegas. These are all the companies that we work for; but somehow that is lost on Obama. The President believes that if he can just create a big bad, greedy enemy that it will help his poll ratings and even win elections. The fact is that President Obama may be the most polarizing, divisive left wing President in American history. It is impossible to have a successful Presidency by dividing our nation.

In the mean time, the Obama Administration provided a "No Bid" $25,000,000 contract to a FAT CAT Obama Contributor. Vincent Checchi, owner of Checchi and Company was provided this large contract to provide "rule of law stabilization training and services" in Afghanistan. First, what the heck is that service and second, many in Afghanistan cannot even read the law or anything else let alone discuss it. We would be better off teaching reading in Afghanistan than American style rule of law training. When will we learn that Western Democratic concepts may not be applicable in the many parts of the world? In any case, I believe it was candidate Obama that was extremely critical of the Bush Administration for providing No Bid contracts to companies like Halliburton to support the war effort in Iraq. Of course, the reason for those contracts was that the timing and need was immediate and therefore the government could not take the customary 12 - 24 months to bid the business. In time of war and emergency, feeding and supporting the troops in the field is a little more important that implementing the normal, bureacratic procurement process.

The Obama Presidency may prove to be one of the most corrupt and incompetent in American History. It is clear if you are a friend of Obama, you get special deals like no taxes, or more union benefits. But if you are on that enemies list, you will pay and pay and pay. We must take back our country in 2010 and 2012. We must elect Conservatives committed to fiscal sanity, lower taxes and less regulations, a balanced budget, a strong national defense, fighting Terrorism, the sanctity of life and family values. We can do it. We will do it.